MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3215441874 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noab196.031

EPCO-32. IDENTIFICATION OF PROGNOSTIC CHORDOMA SUBGROUPS USING DNA METHYLATION SIGNATURES IN TISSUE AND PLASMA

2021· article· en· W3215441874 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey Zuccato, Vikas Patil, Sheila Mansouri, Jeffrey Liu, Farshad Nassiri, Yasin Mamatjan, Ankur Chakravarthy, Shirin Karimi, João Paulo Almeida, Anne-Laure Bernat, Mohammed Hasen, Shahbaz Khan, Thomas Kislinger, Namita Sinha, Sébastien Froelich, Homa Adle‐Biassette, Kenneth Aldape, Daniel D. De Carvalho, Gelareh Zadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChordomaDNA methylationDifferentially methylated regionsProportional hazards modelBiologyEpigeneticsMethylationCancer researchOncologyBioinformaticsInternal medicinePathologyMedicineGeneGeneticsGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND Chordomas are malignant bone cancers arising from the skull-base and spine that are rare but cause devastating central nervous system morbidities. Survival is highly variable despite surgery and radiotherapy as 10% live under 1 year and 30-35% survive over 20 years. There are currently no reliable prognostic factors and this limits our ability to tailor patient treatment to their risk. Accordingly, this work identifies epigenetic prognostic chordoma subgroups that are detectable non-invasively through plasma methylomes to guide treatment. METHODS A total of 68 chordoma surgical specimens resected between 1996-2018 across three international centres underwent DNA methylation profiling. Cell-free methylated tumor DNA immunoprecipitation and high-throughput sequencing was performed on available matched plasma samples. RESULTS Two stable tumor clusters were identified through consensus clustering of tissue methylation data. Clusters had statistically significantly different disease-specific survivals (log-rank p=0.0062) independent of clinical factors in a multivariable Cox analysis (HR=16.5, 95%CI: 2.8-96, p=0.0018). The poorer-performing “Immune-infiltrated” cluster had genes hypomethylated at promoters, typically resulting in transcription, within immune-related pathways and higher immune cell abundance within tumors. The better-performing “Cellular” cluster showed higher tumor cellularity plus cell-to-cell interaction and extracellular matrix pathway hypomethylation. Fifty chordoma-versus-other binomial generalized linear models built using plasma methylome data distinguished chordomas from meningiomas and spinal metastases, as representative clinical differential diagnoses, in random left-out 20% testing sets (mean AUROC=0.84, 95%CI: 0.52-1.00). Plasma-based methylation signatures were highly correlated with tissue-based signals within both poor-performing (median r=0.69, 95%CI: 0.66-0.72) and better-performing cluster tumors (median r=0.67, 95%CI: 0.62-0.72). CONCLUSIONS The first identification of two distinct prognostic epigenetic chordoma subgroups is shown here with “Immune-infiltrated” tumors having a poorer prognosis than “Cellular” tumors. Plasma methylomes can be utilized for non-invasive chordoma diagnosis and subtyping. This work may transform chordoma treatment decision-making by guiding surgical planning in advance to match resection aggressiveness with patient prognosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicBone Tumor Diagnosis and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207