<i>TractoInferno</i> : A large-scale, open-source, multi-site database for machine learning dMRI tractography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract TractoInferno is the world’s largest open-source multi-site tractography database, including both research- and clinical-like human acquisitions, aimed specifically at machine learning tractography approaches and related ML algorithms. It provides 284 datasets acquired from 3T scanners across 6 different sites. Available data includes T1-weighted images, single-shell diffusion MRI (dMRI) acquisitions, spherical harmonics fitted to the dMRI signal, fiber ODFs, and reference streamlines for 30 delineated bundles generated using 4 tractography algorithms, as well as masks needed to run tractography algorithms. Manual quality control was additionally performed at multiple steps of the pipeline. We showcase TractoInferno by benchmarking the learn2track algorithm and 5 variations of the same recurrent neural network architecture. Creating the TractoInferno database required approximately 20,000 CPU-hours of processing power, 200 man-hours of manual QC, 3,000 GPU-hours of training baseline models, and 4 Tb of storage, to produce a final database of 350 Gb. By providing a standardized training dataset and evaluation protocol, TractoInferno is an excellent tool to address common issues in machine learning tractography.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.041 | 0.037 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".