Deep Att-ResGAN: A Retinal Vessel Segmentation Network for Color Fundus Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Retinal vessel segmentation plays a significant role in the diagnosis and treatment of ophthalmological diseases. Recent studies have proved that deep learning can effectively segment the retinal vessel structure. However, the existing methods have difficulty in segmenting thin vessels, especially when the original image contains lesions. Based on generative adversarial network (GAN), this paper proposes a deep network with residual module and attention module (Deep Att-ResGAN). The network consists of four identical subnetworks. The output of each subnetwork is imported to the next subnetwork as contextual features that guide the segmentation. Firstly, the problems of the original image, namely, low contrast, uneven illumination, and data insufficiency, were solved through image enhancement and preprocessing. Next, an improved U-Net was adopted to serve as the generator, which stacks the residual and attention modules. These modules optimize the weight of the generator, and enhance the generalizability of the network. Further, the segmentation was refined iteratively by the discriminator, which contributes to the performance of vessel segmentation. Finally, comparative experiments were carried out on two public datasets: Digital Retinal Images for Vessel Extraction (DRIVE) and Structured Analysis of the Retina (STARE). The experimental results show that Deep Att-ResGAN outperformed the equivalent models like U-Net and GAN in most metrics. Our network achieved accuracy of 0.9565 and F1 of 0.829 on DRIVE, and accuracy of 0.9690 and F1 of 0.841 on STARE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".