MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

UAV Routine Optimization and Obstacle Avoidance Based on ACO for Transmission Line Inspection

2021· article· en· W3215473620 on OpenAlexaff
Tianyi Liu, Dongsheng Yang, Bowen Zhou, Guangdi Li, Mingxi Zhu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Line Inspection Robots
Canadian institutionsInternational Development Research Centre
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsObstacle avoidanceComputer scienceCollision avoidanceObstacleKinematicsTransmission (telecommunications)Line (geometry)Range (aeronautics)Real-time computingComputer visionSimulationArtificial intelligenceEngineeringMobile robotAerospace engineeringMathematicsRobot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, light fixed-wing medium-range Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) is equipped with infrared thermal imager and obstacle avoidance Lidar scanning equipment to transmission line inspection tasks. A mathematical model for the UAV is established to calculate the linear motion and the kinematic corner parameters, different array monitoring solutions are provided for single target and multiple targets. Intelligent algorithms are used to plan the optimal solution of UAV obstacle avoidance routes. Simulation results show that the optimal route can be quickly found when the number of iterations increases and suitable self-adaptive parameters are adopted, which shows the effectiveness of the route optimization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Line Inspection RobotsFrench-language works237,207