Abstract 12511: Differential Regulation of Circulating Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns in Patients With Coronary Artery Ectasia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) defined as localized or diffuse non-obstructive coronary lesions is a rare but well-recognized pathological entity of the coronary arteries and characterized as a variant of coronary atherosclerosis. CAE commonly coexists with coronary artery disease (CAD). Although inflammation appears to be involved, the pathophysiology behind CAE remains unclear. Danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) are altered metabolism products of necrotic or stressed cells, which are deemed as alarm signals by the innate immune system. Inflammatory agents are DAMP generators and DAMPs create a pro-inflammatory state. Hypothesis: We aimed to investigate the different patterns of serum DAMPs in patients with CAE, obstructive CAD and normal coronary arteries and the prognostic role of these in the pathogenesis of CAE. Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, 28 patients with CAE and nonobstructive CAD were enrolled in the study, 19 patients with obstructive CAD but without CAE, and 18 control subjects with normal coronary arteries that have been matched with the CAE patients for age and sex were also enrolled in our study population. Venous blood samples of the participants were collected for serum DAMP evaluation. Results: Patients with CAE and non-obstructive CAD had increased (30-35%) serum levels of the DAMPs, the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) ligand S100B and the toll-like receptor 4 ligand heat shock protein (HSP)70 compared to control subjects and patients with CAD. Additionally, CAE and non-obstructive CAD patients had decreased (30-40%) serum levels of potential DAMPs, the antioxidant DJ-1 and soluble (s)RAGE, a decoy molecule that bind excess RAGE ligands, compared to control subjects and CAD patients. Positive correlations were observed between S100B and HSP70 (p=00564), and DJ-1 and sRAGE (p=0.00461). All evaluated serum DAMPs were not different in CAD patients compared to control subjects. Conclusion: The differential regulation of the DAMPs S100B, HSP70, DJ-1 and sRAGE in CAE versus CAD makes them attractive novel biomarkers as therapeutic targets and therapeutics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".