MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3215511920

Donzelot y el gobierno de la familia: un análisis crítico de los modelos sistémicos en la enfermería

2019· article· es· W3215511920 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Étienne Paradis-Gagné, Dave Holmes

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherche en soins infirmiers · 2019
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El proposito de este articulo es analizar criticamente el modelo de Calgary a traves de la teoria de Jacques Donzelot sobre el gobierno familiar. Segun Donzelot, la familia esta instrumentalizada por el poder (para)medico y se convierte en un terreno fertil para las practicas de gobierno. De esta manera, se invita y «capacita» a la familia para que asuma un papel de auxiliar de enfermeria ademas del su papel de cuidador. El dispositivo (para)medico se impone en la intimidad de la familia, altera su funcionamiento y ejerce un tenue gobierno de conducta en ella. Sin embargo, la perspectiva teorica de Donzelot, por su caracter critico y politico, entra en conflicto con las representaciones habituales de la enfermeria familiar.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.459
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherche en soins infirmiersSame topicSocial Sciences and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207