Transient inhibition to light explains stronger V1 responses to dark stimuli
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) receive excitation and inhibition from distinct parallel pathways processing lightness (ON) and darkness (OFF). V1 neurons overall respond more strongly to dark than light stimuli, consistent with a preponderance of darker regions in natural images, as well as human psychophysics. However, it has been unclear whether this “dark-dominance” is due to more excitation from the OFF pathway or more inhibition from the ON pathway. To understand the mechanisms behind dark-dominance, we record electrophysiological responses of individual simple-type V1 neurons to natural image stimuli and then train biologically inspired convolutional neural networks to predict the neurons’ responses. Analyzing a sample of 74 neurons (in anesthetized, paralyzed cats) has revealed their responses to be more driven by dark than light stimuli, consistent with previous investigations. We show that this asymmetry is predominantly due to slower inhibition to dark stimuli rather than to stronger excitation from the thalamocortical OFF pathway. Consistent with dark-dominant neurons having faster responses than light-dominant neurons, we find dark-dominance to solely occur in the early latencies of neurons’ responses. Neurons that are strongly dark-dominated also tend to be less orientation selective. This novel approach gives us new insight into the dark-dominance phenomenon and provides an avenue to address new questions about excitatory and inhibitory integration in cortical neurons. Significance Neurons in the early visual cortex respond on average more strongly to dark than to light stimuli, but the mechanisms behind this bias have been unclear. Here we address this issue by combining single-unit electrophysiology with a novel machine learning model to analyze neurons’ responses to natural image stimuli in primary visual cortex. Using these techniques, we find slower inhibition to light than to dark stimuli to be the leading mechanism behind stronger dark responses. This slower inhibition to light might help explain other empirical findings, such as why orientation selectivity is weaker at earlier response latencies. These results demonstrate how imbalances in excitation vs. inhibition can give rise to response asymmetries in cortical neuron responses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".