Sequence stratigraphic analysis of the Duvernay Formation, Kaybob area, Alberta, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Upper Devonian Duvernay Formation is an important hydrocarbon source rock in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin and has been a significant unconventional oil, gas liquids, and gas reservoir since 2011. Heterogeneity in this and other shale reservoirs is important in predicting rock properties (such as TOC, porosity, permeability, and brittleness) within self-sourced reservoirs to identify target intervals. These properties can change with systems tracts and position within a basin at several scales and can be predicted by sequence stratigraphic models. In this study, we characterize the lithofacies of the Duvernay Formation and develop a sequence stratigraphic model for the formation in the Kaybob Area of Alberta. We also identify a set of features characteristic of mudstone sequence boundaries, describe how they vary stratigraphically and geographically, and interpret processes responsible for their formation. Five lithofacies were identified in 11 Duvernay cores from the Kaybob area of Alberta, characterized by composition, grain size, sedimentary structures, bioturbation, and cement. Lithofacies were deposited by a combination of suspension settling, sediment-gravity flows, and bottom currents under anoxic to fully oxygenated bottom water conditions. Lithofacies distribution was strongly affected by proximity to sediment sources, bottom topography, and sea level cyclicity. Relatively coarse-grained, carbonate-rich, bioturbated, and organic-poor facies are common close to large carbonate platforms and reefs; silt- and sand-rich facies deposited by bottom currents and sediment gravity flows are common on the slopes of large carbonate platforms; hemipelagic deposited, fine grained, biosiliceous, organic-rich facies are common in distal areas of the basin. Transgressive deposits are characterized by increasingly fine-grained, biosiliceous, organic-rich facies; highstand deposits by increasingly coarsegrained, carbonate-rich, bioturbated, organic-poor facies; lowstand deposits by detrital clay-rich, bioturbated facies. Sequence stratigraphic surfaces were identified in the 11 cores and correlated across a network of approximately 600 wireline wells in the Kaybob area to develop a sequence stratigraphic model. Three 3rd order depositional sequences and 4th order depositional sequences are identified within the Duvernay. Two types of 3rd order sequence boundaries are identified, their expression dependent on their position within a 2nd order depositional sequence that encompassed the Duvernay. In the 2nd order transgression, sequence boundaries are expressed as scoured surfaces with coarse overlying lags that represent a period of sediment starvation and reworking during lowstand conditions and early transgression. In the 2nd order highstand, sequence boundaries are expressed as soft sedimentdeformed surfaces overlain by coarse beds that represent a period of forced regression, with the sequence boundary located at the top. Surfaces become gradational and overlying lags or forced regressive deposits thin basinward. The high-density data set in our relatively small study area enables us to map 3rd and 4th order sequence stratigraphic surfaces across the study area with a high degree of certainty. We were also able to interpret major sources of sediment and determine geographic extent of topographical features during different stages of Duvernay Formation deposition from geographic distribution of facies and variations in systems tract isopachs. Our interpretation of sequence boundaries produced during a 2nd order TST are consistent with several previous studies that interpreted sequence boundaries in mudstones as combined sequence boundaries and transgressive surfaces overlain by winnowed lags. Our interpretation of sequence boundaries produced during a 2nd order HST differs from previous studies in that we propose the coarse sand beds at sequence boundaries were deposited during forced regression, with the sequence boundary located at its top.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".