Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Canada à l'aube des années 2000 resscmble peu au Canada de 1867, date de création du Dominion du Canada. La composition de sa population a radicalemcnt changé, son économie et sa culture ont été profondément modifiées. Rien là de bien original, dira-t-on, puisque les autres pays analysés dans ce numéro ont connu des évolutions comparables sur bien des aspects. Mais ce qui distingue le Canada est sans doute le fait que les valeurs fondatrices du pays ont elles aussi changé. Les nouvelles valeurs cardinales de la société canadienne, celles qui légitiment la représentation de lui-même que le nouveau Canada entend sc donner, sont maintenant l’egalité entre les individus, l’égalité entre les provinces, le multiculturalisme, le bilinguisme officiel des institutions fédérales, le respect des droits individuels et la recherche du bien-être et de la sécurité sociale des citoyens, valeurs auxquelles il faut ajouter la reconnaissance de l’identité des nations autochtones qui, comme le retour du refoulé en psychanalyse, sortent en force de l’oubli relatif dans lequel les avait relégués l’histoire canadienne (Laforcst 1992, 1995 ; McRoberts 1991, 1995, 1997 ; Robertson 1991 ; Taylor 1986. 1992).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.030 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".