A functional proportional hazard cure rate model for interval-censored data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Existing survival models involving functional covariates typically rely on the Cox proportional hazards structure and the assumption of right censorship. Motivated by the aim of predicting the time of conversion to Alzheimer's disease from sparse biomarker trajectories in patients with mild cognitive impairment, we propose a functional mixture cure rate model with both functional and scalar covariates for interval censoring and sparsely sampled functional data. To estimate the nonparametric coefficient function that depicts the effect of the shape of the trajectories on the survival outcome and cure probability, we utilize the functional principal component analysis to extract the functional features from the sparsely and irregularly sampled trajectories. To obtain parameter estimates from the mixture cure rate model with interval censoring, we apply the expectation-maximization algorithm based on Poisson data augmentation. The estimation accuracy of our method is assessed via a simulation study and we apply our model on Alzheimer's disease Neuroimaging Initiative data set.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.035 | 0.466 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it