Understanding crystallographic orientation, microstructure and mechanical properties dependent interaction between recrystallization and phase transformation of a Fe–Al–Mn–Mo–C dual-phase steel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The competition mechanism of ferritic recrystallization and austenitic transformation, nucleation and growth kinetics of different crystallographic orientation components during intercritical annealing of a cold-rolling Fe–Al–Mn–Mo–C deep drawing dual-phase steel were investigated by a series of continuous annealing simulation experiments. The experiments provided an insight into the microstructural characteristics and mechanical behaviors that were caused from the interaction of primary recrystallization and phase transformation. The results show that the promoting effect of austenite transformation is greater than that of ferrite recrystallization with the increase of temperature in the two-phase region, and an appropriate soaking time is contributed to the formation and development of {111} oriented grains. Austenite formation affects morphology and size of the microstructure owing to inhibiting ferrite recrystallization and growth. From these that experimental data of the observed temperature or time-dependent mechanical properties can be interpreted. An excellent comprehensive properties with tensile strength of 480 MPa and plastic strain ratio (r value) of 1.15 can be obtained at annealing temperature of 880 °C for 300 s.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".