MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Far-Right Visions of Heteronormativity and Queer Members of the Far Right: A Historical Perspective

2021· article· en· W3215718465 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anita Kurimay

Bibliographic record

VenueHungarian Studies Review · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean history and politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueerHeteronormativityVisionGender studiesHuman sexualityHomosexualityPerspective (graphical)LesbianGay rightsPolitical scienceIconSociologyLawPoliticsArtAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This essay examines the recent homosexual scandal of József Szájer, founding member of the Hungarian governing party Fidesz, and compares it to the interwar homosexual scandal of Hungarian conservative icon Cécile Tormay. It highlights how even as Fidesz has been limiting the rights and visibility of LGBTQ+ people in the name of defending Christian national values, it has not just tolerated but facilitated its own queer members’ sexual escapades. Historicizing Fidesz’s calculated approach to elevate the issue of homosexuality to an issue of national security also offers insight into how anti-Western and antidemocratic sentiments function in East Central Europe using the fulcrums of gender and sexuality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score0.376

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHungarian Studies ReviewSame topicEuropean history and politicsFrench-language works237,207