A robust algorithm for automatic development of neural network models for microwave applications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a robust algorithm for automating the neural network based RF/Microwave model development process. The algorithm can build a neural model starting with zero amount of training/test data, and then proceeding with neural network training in a stage-wise manner. In each stage, the algorithm utilizes neural network error criteria to determine additional training/test samples required and their location in model input space. The algorithm dynamically generates these new data samples during training, by automatic driving of simulation tools, e.g., OSA90, Ansoft-HFSS. Initially, fewer hidden neurons are used, and the algorithm adjusts the neural network size whenever it detects under-learning. Our technique integrates all the sub-tasks involved in neural modeling, thereby facilitating a more efficient and automated model building process. It significantly reduces the intensive human effort demanded by the conventional step-by-step neural modeling approach. The algorithm is demonstrated through MESFET and Embedded Capacitor examples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it