Treatment of Portal, Mesenteric, and Splenic Vein Thrombosis with Rivaroxaban: A Pilot, Prospective Cohort Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Anticoagulation plays a crucial role in the treatment of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), including thrombosis of the portal (PVT), mesenteric (MVT) and splenic (SpVT) veins. Rivaroxaban is a potential alternative to heparins and vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in these patients, but data to support its use are scant. Several recent guidelines highlighted the limited evidence available for the use of the direct oral anticoagulants in these patients. In addition, despite anticoagulation, SVT patients carry high risk of recurrent venous thromboembolic events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban for the acute-phase treatment of SVT (first 3 months of treatment). Methods: RIVASVT-100 (NCT02627053) was a prospective cohort study of adult patients with a first episode of symptomatic, objectively diagnosed PVT, MVT or SpVT. Exclusion criteria were known liver cirrhosis, Budd-Chiari syndrome, previous or ongoing variceal bleeding, portal cavernoma, thrombocytopenia, severe renal failure, life expectancy <3 months, concomitant interfering medications, treatment with therapeutic dose of heparins for >7 days, ongoing VKA treatment. Patients received rivaroxaban 15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, followed by 20 mg once daily for a total of 3 months. Afterwards, the decision to continue any available anticoagulant drug was left to the discretion of the attending physicians. Follow-up was performed at 3 weeks, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months. Primary outcome was the occurrence of ISTH-defined major bleeding events during the 3 months of active treatment and up to 2 days after the end of study treatment. Secondary outcomes included death, clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), recurrent SVT or symptomatic venous thromboembolism in other sites. We here report the results of the 3-month follow-up. Results: Between June 2015 and March 2021, 103 patients were enrolled from 18 participating centres. After excluding 3 patients who did not meet the criteria for eligibility, 100 patients were included in the analysis. Mean (SD) age was 54.4 (± 15.5) years; 64% were males. Overall, 74% of patients had PVT, 61% MVT and 48% SpVT; 53% of SVT occurred in multiple sites. The most common risk factors were abdominal inflammation/infection (26%), followed by solid cancer (9%), overt myeloproliferative neoplasms (9%) and oestrogen hormonal therapy (9%), while 43% of cases were unprovoked. The JAK2 V617F mutation was detected in 13 out of 50 tested patients (26%). Rivaroxaban was the sole anticoagulant agent used in 21% of patients, whereas the remaining received a combination of anticoagulants, which included low molecular weight heparin, unfractionated heparin or fondaparinux for a median of 5.0 days before transitioning to rivaroxaban. Three patients were lost to follow-up but known to be alive at the end of the study. At 3-month follow-up, 1 (1.0%) patient died due to a non-SVT related cause. Two patients (2.06%; 95% CI, 0.57-7.21) had major bleeding events (both gastrointestinal), while 3 patients (3.09%) had CRNMB. There were 2 recurrent SVT (2.06%) during rivaroxaban treatment, one of these occurred in a patient with metastatic solid cancer. The 6-month follow-up for the last enrolled patient is ongoing. Conclusions: Rivaroxaban appears to be safe and effective for the acute-phase treatment of SVT in non-cirrhotic patients. Disclosures Beyer-Westendorf: Bayer: Other: Personal fees; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: Personal fees; Pfizer: Other: Personal fees; Portola-Alexion: Other: Personal fees. Carrier: BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Leo Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Bertoletti: BMS: Honoraria, Other: Personal Fees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: Personal fees; Aspen: Other: Personal Fees; Bayer: Other: Personal Fees; Leo Pharma: Other: Personal Fee. Di Nisio: Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, BMS-Pfizer, Leo Pharma, and Sanofi: Other: Personal fees. Ageno: Bayer: Research Funding; Bayer, Portola, Janssen, Aspen, Norgine, Sanofi.: Other: Advisory Board. OffLabel Disclosure: The use of rivaroxaban in splanchnic vein thrombosis is off label in most countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".