MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Faktor-Faktor Kecemasan Tenaga Kesehatan Selama Pandemi COVID-19

2021· article· id· W3215773126 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueINSAN Jurnal Psikologi dan Kesehatan Mental · 2021
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCOVID-19 Prevention and Impact
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Salah satu dampak dari pandemi COVID-19 adalah meningkatnya prevalensi kecemasan tenaga kesehatan. Penelitian ini bersifat analisis kuantitatif dengan desain studi cross-sectional. Sebanyak 167 tenaga kesehatan yang bekerja di RSUD Pasar Rebo direkrut sebagai sampel menggunakan teknik convenience sampling. Pengumpulan data dilakukan menggunakan kuesioner Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale yang disebarkan secara daring. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan uji Chi Square. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa terdapat hubungan yang bermakna antara jenis kelamin, usia, status pernikahan, status memiliki anak, bekerja sebagai perawat, dan beban kerja berat dengan tingkat kecemasan pada tenaga kesehatan. Diharapkan rumah sakit dapat mengambil upaya khusus untuk menjaga kesehatan mental tenaga kesehatan seperti memberikan konsultasi, mensosialisasikan mekanisme coping yang efektif pada tenaga kesehatan

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.674
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it