MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3215797231 · doi:10.1093/aje/kwab282

Profiles in Epidemiology: Dr. Larry Svenson

2021· article· en· W3215797231 on OpenAlexaffabout
Erin Kirwin, Shannon E. MacDonald, Kimberley Simmonds

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Epidemiology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)BachelorMetropolitan areaChristian ministryLibrary sciencePolitical sciencePublic healthPublic administrationGerontologySociologyMedicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dr. Larry Svenson is a Canadian epidemiologist who has effectively merged academic and government roles. Born October 26, 1964, in Summerside, Prince Edward Island, Canada, Svenson graduated with a bachelor of science degree from the University of Alberta (Edmonton, Alberta, Canada) in 1988 after majoring in psychology and minoring in statistics. Svenson began his career as a research assistant in 1991 with the Alberta Ministry of Health. Realizing the opportunities for applied research to directly inform policy, he advanced in government while participating in collaborative research, coauthoring more than 140 publications before receiving his PhD from Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, England, in 2015. Svenson’s greatest contributions use administrative health data research to address health policy needs. In 1999, Svenson led the pilot and development of the National Diabetes Surveillance System, which established common administrative case definitions across Canadian provinces, thereby addressing heterogeneity in data collection and quality (1,...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.046
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.046
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of EpidemiologySame topicHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionFrench-language works237,207