A Patient-Centered Approach to Gathering Information on Social Determinants of Health from Patients with Sickle Cell Disease in Preparation for Their Transition to Adult Care
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: Transition from pediatric to adult care has been a recent focus of sickle cell programs across the country due to patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) to living longer. 1 Transition programs for other chronic conditions focus largely on patient knowledge of the disease, treatments, and appointment compliance but for patients with SCD, social determinants of health (SDOH) must also be considered when guiding patients toward adult care. 2 Historically, lack of acknowledgement of the importance of relationships and trust building when addressing SDOH has led to barriers in patient responsiveness. 3 To facilitate this aspect of transition, our recently hired Community Health Worker (CHW) developed a Community Health Transitional Questionnaire (CHTQ) and conducted a Quality Improvement (QI) project to address SDOH in a patient-centered manner during transition to adult care visits at the clinic. Aims: Refine the CHTQ by gathering the "voice of the customer" to provide a more patient-centered approach to transition to adult care for patients with SCD. Complete the CHTQ with 70% of transition-aged (12-25 years) patients by 7/1/21. Methods: The CHTQ consists of 32 questions about SDOH in 8 categories (Food, Housing, Money/Finances, Transportation, Education/Work, Family and Other Support, Stress Prior to/After COVID, and Sleep). Thirty pediatric sickle cell patients were identified as being within the established transitional age group. A series of Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were used to refine the CHTQ. Through patient/caregiver feedback, small increments of change were used to establish a CHTQ that would improve patient care and be accepted by the patients/caregivers. PDSA #1: During regularly scheduled appointments, two patients and their caregivers met with the CHW who described the purpose of the CHTQ and then asked the patient to privately complete the CHTQ. PDSA #2: Because of feedback received from PDSA #1, the CHW allowed the next two patients to have caregivers present while answering the CHTQ, but explained that ideally the patient should be able to answer the CHTQ without input from their caregiver before transition to an adult environment. PDSA #3: Because of the feedback received from PDSA #2, the CHW accompanied the clinic RN to the exam room and worked the CHTQ into the nursing check-in questions in an informal manner making the questions seem more routine. Results: After 3 PDSA cycles, 17 additional patients/caregivers completed the CHTQ without issues or concerns. A total of 22/30 (73%) CHTQs met the goal of completion by 7/1/21. One additional CHTQ has been completed since. Using the information from the CHTQ, the team has been able to better address individualized SDOH for each patient. For example, one area of concern identified was transportation with 9/23 (39%) patients expressing concerns getting to & from appointments and/or school/work. Transportation needs were then discussed with the clinic social worker who is now working with those patients, giving them tools to arrange transportation. Conclusion For SCD patients, it appears imperative that a relationship be established prior to inquires about SDOH. Using an informal patient-centered approach with the CHTQ was more likely to gain patient trust and allowed the CHW to obtain information needed to assist the patient with SDOH issues. Once SDOH issues were identified through the CHTQ, the CHW was able to find patient-driven, individualized resources addressing those concerns. References DeBaun, M.R. & Telfair, J. (2012). Transition and Sickle Cell Disease. PEDIATRICS, 130(5), 926-935 https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-3049 Andermann, A. (2016). Taking action on the social determinants of health in clinical practice: a framework for health professionals. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 188(17-18), E474-E483. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.160177 Cheney, C., Pecci, A., & Porter, S (2020, May). Social Determinants of Health: Lead or Partner. HealthLeaders. https://www.healthleadersmedia.com/clinical-care/social-determinants-health-lead-or-partner-0 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".