Bibliographic record
Abstract
The force- and flow-induced translocation processes of linear and ring polymers are studied using a combination of multiparticle collision dynamics and molecular dynamics, focusing on the behavior of the polymer translocation time. We compare the force- and flow-induced translocations of linear and ring polymers. It is found that when the translocation time (τ*) is characterized by scaling exponents, δ, δ′, and α, via the relations τ* ∼ f δ N α and τ* ∼ J δ′ N α, the scaling exponents are not constants. For long chains tested, α = 1.0 for both force- and flow-induced translocations. The difference between the force- and flow-induced translocations stems from different monomer crowding effects due to distinct flow patterns outside the channel. Furthermore, general relations for polymer translocation time are derived for these two translocation processes, which are in good agreement with the simulation results. Our results provide clear molecular pictures for the force- and flow-induced translocations, which shed light on the understanding of translocation dynamics and provide guidance for practical applications such as molecular sequencing and ultrafiltration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".