MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3215837910 · doi:10.33423/jabe.v22i8.3266

Effect of COVID-19 on Globalization: An Economic Perspective

2020· article· en· W3215837910 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sushma Shukla

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Business and Economics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobalizationPandemicUnemploymentScarcityDevelopment economicsGoods and servicesEconomic globalizationEconomicsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Economic growthBusinessEconomyMarket economyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

COVID-19 pandemic is not only affecting global citizen’s health but also global economic health. Globalization has been a surge from the last couple of decades, which has positive and negative effects on our society. Globalization has reduced the scarcity of goods and services around the world. COVID- 19 will affect human societies in many ways, mentally, physically, and economically for many years. This paper investigates the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the globalization. It is challenging to measure the effect because of the uncertainty of this natural phenomenon and human behavior. However, the author tried to make the best use of available resources to investigate. This paper uses variables economic growth, unemployment, and trade at a global level. Analysis suggests that slowing down economic activities, mobilization, and dependency on other countries for necessary goods like medication and PPE equipment can encourage economies to be more self-sufficient in the coming years. After this pandemic end, we might see a different world an inclination towards deglobalization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.400
Threshold uncertainty score0.865

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Business and EconomicsSame topicCOVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsFrench-language works237,207