Reflejos del pasado medieval valenciano a través de un salterio cartujo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Bodleian Library in Oxford preserves in the Canonici Liturgici collection a Carthusian Psalter (ms. 114) (19261) associated with the artistic production of the kingdom of Valencia in the third quarter of the 15th century. This codex, practically unknown to art historians, is interesting because it comes from one of the two medieval charterhouses of the kingdom of Valencia: the Portaceli Charterhouse or the Valldecrist Charterhouse founded by King Martin I of Aragon. The manuscript is illustrated with and interesting image of King David which shows the Flemish influence in the kingdom of Valencia and the unpublished representation of San Martin de Tours. The latter illustration responds to the artistic forms developed by Leonardo Crespi and his miniaturists’ workshop during the second quarter of 15th century. These representations weave a network of contacts with other codices linked to the two aforementioned monastic centres and to the city of Valencia, receiving the northern artistic novelties. The marginal decoration, dependent of Central European models, is another testimony of the confluence of different artistic languages in the Crown of Aragon throughout this period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".