MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Penentuan Besaran Premi Asuransi Jiwa Berjangka dengan Model True Fractional Premiums

2018· article· id· W3215883858 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Muhammad Al-Firdaus Erdian, Ika Purnamasari, Wenny Kristina

Bibliographic record

VenueEksponensial · 2018
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Studies and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaymentActuarial scienceQuarter (Canadian coin)BusinessLife insuranceEconometricsEconomicsFinanceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The model of the payment of life insurance premium that can be paid more than once a year is called fractional premiums. This model consists of two types, namely true fractional premiums and apportionable premium. The true fractional premiums is divided into two models of payment of compensation, namely discrete payment model and continuous payment model. This study aims to find out the comparison of 20 years life insurance premium with true fractional premiums model based on gender and number of payments made in a year from both payment models. The data used in this research is the simulation data. Based on the research result, it is found that the amount of life insurance premium using discrete compensation payment model is cheaper than the one using the continuous payment model. While based on gender, the premium of male is more expensive than female. Based on the amount of payments made in one year, payments made each month are more expensive than the payments made each quarter and semester.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.537
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEksponensialSame topicLegal Studies and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207