TMOD-01. AN IN VIVO FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS SCREEN TO IDENTIFY NOVEL DRIVERS OF LUNG-TO-BRAIN METASTASIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract INTRODUCTION Brain metastases, the most common tumors of the central nervous system, occur in approximately 20% of primary adult cancers. In particular, 40% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer develop brain metastasis. As systemic therapies for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer become increasingly effective at controlling primary disease, patients are ironically succumbing to their brain metastases. This highlights a large unmet need to develop novel targeted therapies for the treatment of lung-to-brain metastases (LBM). We hypothesize that an in vivo functional genomic screen can identify novel genes that drive LBM. METHODS To do this, we developed a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse model of LBM using patient lung cancer cell lines. This PDX model of LBM enables the use of fluorescent and bioluminescent in vivo imaging to track the progression of lung tumor and brain metastases. RESULTS We have performed an in vivo genome-wide CRISPR activation screening to identify novel drivers of LBM. We will derive candidate genes through mouse brain and lung tissue sequencing after mice reach endpoint. EXPECTED AREA OF FINDINGS This platform will lead to potential therapeutic targets to prevent the formation of LBM and prolong the survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. LIMITATIONS There may be limitations in getting candidate hits that overlap in all mice in our first replicate. This can be remedied by conducting the in vivo screen in at least three biological replicates. CONCLUSION To the best of our knowledge, this is the first genome-wide in vivo CRISPR activation screen searching for drivers of LBM using a PDX animal model. This study can provide a framework to gain a deeper understanding of the regulators of BM formation which will hopefully lead to targeted drug discovery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".