MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3215903943 · doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ac3dfe

Updates to LUCI: A New Fitting Paradigm Using Mixture Density Networks

2021· article· en· W3215903943 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Notes of the AAS · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre for Research in Astrophysics of Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAlgorithmInferencePoint (geometry)ComputationConvolutional neural networkCode (set theory)Bayesian inferencePipeline (software)Simple (philosophy)GaussianBayesian probabilityMachine learningArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract LUCI is an general-purpose spectral line-fitting pipeline which natively integrates machine learning algorithms to initialize fit functions. LUCI currently uses point-estimates obtained from a convolutional neural network (CNN) to inform optimization algorithms; this methodology has shown great promise by reducing computation time and reducing the chance of falling into a local minimum using convex optimization methods. In this update to LUCI, we expand upon the CNN developed in Rhea et al. so that it outputs Gaussian posterior distributions of the fit parameters of interest (the velocity and broadening) rather than simple point-estimates. Moreover, these posteriors are then used to inform the priors in a Bayesian inference scheme, either emcee or dynesty . The code is publicly available at crhea93:LUCI ( https://github.com/crhea93/LUCI ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.797
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it