MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3215909415 · doi:10.4000/trema.6594

Bibliothèques de classe de maternelle 4 ans : quelle offre pour les enfants en milieu défavorisé ?

2021· article· fr· W3215909415 on OpenAlex
Élaine Turgeon, Annie Charron, Sarah Jane McKinley

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueTréma · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicReading and Literacy Development
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plusieurs études ont démontré qu’un environnement physique de qualité soutient le développement des habiletés en émergence de l’écrit des jeunes enfants à l’éducation préscolaire, particulièrement chez les enfants issus de milieux défavorisés et ceux n’ayant pas le français comme langue maternelle. Cet article s’inscrit dans une plus vaste étude menée au Québec, dans 30 classes de maternelle 4 ans à temps plein en milieu défavorisé (TPMD). Nous présentons les résultats d’un volet de l’étude qui visait à décrire et à évaluer l’offre de livres de bibliothèques de classe accessibles aux enfants. Dans l’ensemble, il ressort que le niveau de la qualité des bibliothèques en ce qui concerne l’offre de livres se situe entre le niveau faible et minimal, et ce, autant pour le critère de la quantité, que pour celui de la variété et de la qualité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it