MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3215926864 · doi:10.5194/essd-2021-281

SiDroForest: A comprehensive forest inventory of Siberian boreal forest investigations including drone-based point clouds, individually labelled trees, synthetically generated tree crowns and Sentinel-2 labelled image patches

2021· article· en· W3215926864 on OpenAlexaff
Femke van Geffen, Birgit Heim, Frederic Brieger, Rongwei Geng, Iuliia Shevtsova, Luise Schulte, Simone Maria Stuenzi, Nadine Bernhardt, Elena Troeva, Luidmila A. Pestryakova, Evgenij S. Zakharov, Bringfried Pflug, Ulrike Herzschuh, Stefan Kruse

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVegetation (pathology)TaigaForest inventoryBorealGeographyPhysical geographyPoint cloudForestryDigital elevation modelTree (set theory)TundraRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceEcologyForest managementArcticComputer scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. This data collection is an attempt to remedy the scarcity of tree level forest structure data in the circum-boreal region, whilst providing, as part of the data collection, adjusted and labelled tree level and vegetation plot level data for machine learning and upscaling practices. Publicly available comprehensive datasets on tree level forest structure are rare, due to the involvement of governmental agencies, public sectors, and private actors that all influence the availability of these datasets. We present datasets of vegetation composition and tree and plot level forest structure for two important vegetation transition zones in Siberia, Russia; the summergreen–evergreen transition zone in central Yakutia and the tundra–taiga transition zone in Chukotka (NE Siberia). The SiDroForest collection contains a variety of data mainly based on unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and field data collected from 64 vegetation plots during fieldwork jointly performed by the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research (AWI) and the North-Eastern Federal University of Yakutsk (NEFU) during the Chukotka 2018 expedition to Siberia. The data collection consists of four separate datasets. The fieldwork locations are the anchors that bind the data types together based on the location of the vegetation plot. i) The first dataset (Kruse et al., 2021, https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.933263) provides UAV-borne data products covering the 64 vegetation plots surveyed during fieldwork: including structure from motion (SfM) point clouds, point-cloud products such as Digital Elevation Model (DEM), Canopy Height Model (CHM), Digital Surface Model (DSM) and Digital Terrain Model (DTM) constructed from Red Green Blue (RGB) and Red Green Near Infrared (RGN) orthomosaics. Forest structure and vegetation composition data are crucial in the assessment of whether a forest is to act as a carbon sink under changing climate conditions. Fieldwork and UAV-products can provide such data in depth. ii) The second dataset contains spatial data in the form of points and polygon shape files of 872 labelled individual trees and shrubs that were recorded during fieldwork at the same vegetation plots with information on tree height, crown diameter, and species (van Geffen et al., 2021c, https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.932821). These tree- and shrub-individual labelled point and polygon shape files were generated and are located on the UAV RGB orthoimages. The individual number links to the information collected during the expedition such as tree height, crown diameter and vitality provided in table format. This dataset can be used to link individual trees in the SfM point clouds, providing unique insights into the vegetation composition and also allows future monitoring of the individual trees and the contents of the recorded vegetation plots at large. iii) The third dataset contains a synthesis of 10 000 generated images and masks that have the tree crowns of two species of larch (Larix gmelinii and Larix cajanderi) automatically extracted from the RGB UAV images in the common objects in context (COCO) format (van Geffen et al., 2021a, https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.932795). The synthetic dataset was created specifically to detect Siberian larch species. iv) If publicly available forest-structure datasets at tree level are rarely available for Siberia, even fewer ready-to-use tree and plot level data are available for machine learning approaches, for example optimised data formats containing annotated vegetation categories. The fourth set contains Sentinel-2 Level-2 bottom of atmosphere labelled image patches with seasonal information and annotated vegetation categories covering the vegetation plots (van Geffen et al., 2021b, https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.933268). The dataset is created with the aim of providing a small ready-to use validation and training data set to be used in various vegetation-related machine-learning tasks. The SidroForest data collection serves a variety of user communities. First of all, the UAV-derived top of canopy structure information, orthomosaics and the detailed vegetation information in the labelled data set provide detailed information on forest type, structure and composition for scientific communities with ecological and biological applications. The detailed Land Cover and Vegetation structure information in the first two data sets are of use for the generation and validation of Land Cover remote sensing products in radar and optical remote sensing. In addition to providing information on forest structure and vegetation composition of the vegetation plots, parts of the SiDroForest dataset are prepared to be used as training and validation data for machine learning purposes. For example, the Synthetic tree crown dataset is generated from the raw UAV images and optimized to be used in neural networks. Furthermore, the fourth SiDroForest data set contains standardized Sentinel-2 labelled image patches that provide training data on vegetation class categories for machine learning classification with JSON labels provided. The SiDroForst data collective serves as a basis to add future data collected during expeditions performed by the Alfred Wegener Institute, creating a larger dataset in the upcoming years that can provide unique insights into remote hard to reach boreal regions of Siberia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207