Thermo-kinetic study to explicate the bioenergy potential of Holy Thistle (HT)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biomass is one of the key components for bioenergy generation in recent epoch as traditional resources and depleting swiftly. Going through this fact, the present study aims to appraise the feasibility of Holy Thistle (HT) to produce energy and valuable organic chemicals through pyrolysis. The HT was pyrolyzed at four heating rates including, 10, 20, 30, and 40 °C min−1 to perform thermo kinetic modeling and estimate thermodynamics parameters to establish the pyrolysis reaction process. The pyrolysis process of HT illustrated about 85–88 % of thermal degradation achieved through three different stages from 30 to 800 °C. The major degradation stage was observed from 170 to 450 °C with 55% to 60 % product formation from mainly cellulose and hemicelluloses components. Moreover, the average activation energy and pre-exponential factors demonstrated to be 183–184 kJ mol−1 and 1010 min−1 to 1025 min−1, respectively. The pyrolytic products exhibited agreement to the cleaner production of bio-gas, char and bio-oil which is evident for the potential and productivity of the feed combination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".