Exponentially Tilted Gaussian Prior for Variational Autoencoder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An important propertyfor deep neural networks to possess is the ability to perform robust out of distribution detection (OOD) on previously unseen data. This property is essential for safety purposes when deploying models for real world applications. Recent studies show that probabilistic generative models can perform poorly on this task, which is surprising given that they seek to estimate the likelihood of training data. To alleviate this issue, we propose the exponentially tilted Gaussian prior distribution for the Variational Autoencoder (VAE). With this prior, we are able to achieve state-of-the art results using just the negative log likelihood that the VAE naturally assigns, while being orders of magnitude faster than some competitive methods. We also show that our model produces high quality image samples which are more crisp than that of a standard Gaussian VAE. The new prior distribution has a very simple implementation which uses a Kullback Leibler divergence that compares the difference between a latent vector's length, and the radius of a sphere.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".