MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3215977758 · doi:10.1002/adem.202100787

Mechanical Metamaterials with Discontinuous and Tension/Compression‐Dependent Positive/Negative Poisson's Ratio

2021· article· en· W3215977758 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Engineering Materials · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCellular and Composite Structures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAuxeticsMetamaterialMaterials scienceCompression (physics)Deformation (meteorology)Poisson's ratioTension (geology)ModulusComposite materialFinite element methodMechanicsStructural engineeringPoisson distributionPhysicsMathematicsOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ordinary materials have positive Poisson's ratios (PRs), and the currently known mechanical metamaterials possess negative PRs both under tension and compression. Herein, two types of novel cellular structure units with tension/compression‐dependent positive/negative PRs are demonstrated. For type I structure, the unit exhibits a positive PR during tension and a negative PR during compression, while for type II structure, the unit shows a negative PR during tension and a positive PR during compression. The deformation behaviors of the new metamaterials are first predicted by a simple analytical model and finite‐element method calculations, and the predicted results are then confirmed experimentally. Numerical and experimental studies show that for the plane angle , the unit of the new metamaterial switches its PR under compression and exhibits a discontinuous change in the PR. The deformation law does not depend on either the Young's modulus or the hardness of the material. The geometrically determined deformation behaviors of the proposed metamaterials are observed in 2D and 3D cellular structures and are proven to be robust through numerical and experimental studies. The proposed mechanical metamaterials can be applied as new deformation‐protected materials in energy‐absorbing devices, soft robotics, and tissue engineering scaffolds and as thermal deformation materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it