MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3216022990 · doi:10.1080/0950236x.2022.2003090

‘I am getting on nicely in the dark’: the environments of ‘Proteus’

2021· article· en· W3216022990 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTextual Practice · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicModernist Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcocriticismDictionNatural (archaeology)PhilosophyGrammarEpistemologyLiteratureHistoryEnvironmental ethicsArtLinguisticsArchaeologyPoetry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This essay examines the ‘Proteus’ chapter of Joyce’s Ulysses from the standpoint of ecocritical theory, arguing throughout that Joyce salvages a notion of ecological vibrancy from a depleted, near-barren landscape. The essay assumes from the outset that ‘Proteus’ offers something like proto-work in ecological theory and that Joyce’s attention to nature and natural processes are implicated in the diction, grammar, and aesthetic form of the chapter. Analyzing emergent and established concerns of the still evolving discourse of ecocriticism, the essay ultimately argues that Joyce was an early observer of the many ways in which we inhabit nature and it inhabits us.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.684

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it