MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3216044898 · doi:10.3390/e23121586

Right-Censored Time Series Modeling by Modified Semi-Parametric A-Spline Estimator

2021· article· en· W3216044898 on OpenAlexaff
Dursun Aydın, S. Ejaz Ahmed, Ersin Yılmaz

Bibliographic record

VenueEntropy · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstimatorSpline (mechanical)Semiparametric modelSemiparametric regressionComputer scienceParametric statisticsMathematicsSmoothing splineMonte Carlo methodParametric modelMathematical optimizationApplied mathematicsStatisticsSpline interpolationEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on the adaptive spline (A-spline) fitting of the semiparametric regression model to time series data with right-censored observations. Typically, there are two main problems that need to be solved in such a case: dealing with censored data and obtaining a proper A-spline estimator for the components of the semiparametric model. The first problem is traditionally solved by the synthetic data approach based on the Kaplan-Meier estimator. In practice, although the synthetic data technique is one of the most widely used solutions for right-censored observations, the transformed data's structure is distorted, especially for heavily censored datasets, due to the nature of the approach. In this paper, we introduced a modified semiparametric estimator based on the A-spline approach to overcome data irregularity with minimum information loss and to resolve the second problem described above. In addition, the semiparametric B-spline estimator was used as a benchmark method to gauge the success of the A-spline estimator. To this end, a detailed Monte Carlo simulation study and a real data sample were carried out to evaluate the performance of the proposed estimator and to make a practical comparison.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEntropySame topicStatistical Methods and InferenceFrench-language works237,207