MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3216055410 · doi:10.37213/cjal.2021.31452

Review of Deterritorializing Language, Teaching, Learning, and Research. Deleuzo-Guattarian Perspectives on Second Language Education

2021· article· en· W3216055410 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Magali Forte

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Applied Linguistics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiteracy, Media, and Education
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLanguage educationComprehension approachLinguisticsLanguage acquisitionLanguage assessmentLanguage pedagogyApplied linguisticsPedagogyMathematics educationPsychologySociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deterritorializing Language, Teaching, Learning, and Research. Deleuzo-Guattarian Perspectives on Second Language Education. An article from journal Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics / Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée (Volume 24, Number 3, Fall 2021, pp. I-209), on Érudit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0130.017
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.007
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Applied LinguisticsSame topicLiteracy, Media, and EducationFrench-language works237,207