Kinetic modelling of dissolution dynamic nuclear polarisation <sup>13</sup>C magnetic resonance spectroscopy data for analysis of pyruvate delivery and fate in tumours
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dissolution dynamic nuclear polarisation (dDNP) of 13 C‐labelled pyruvate in magnetic resonance spectroscopy/imaging (MRS/MRSI) has the potential for monitoring tumour progression and treatment response. Pyruvate delivery, its metabolism to lactate and efflux were investigated in rat P22 sarcomas following simultaneous intravenous administration of hyperpolarised 13 C‐labelled pyruvate ( 13 C 1 ‐pyruvate) and urea ( 13 C‐urea), a nonmetabolised marker. A general mathematical model of pyruvate‐lactate exchange, incorporating an arterial input function (AIF), enabled the losses of pyruvate and lactate from tumour to be estimated, in addition to the clearance rate of pyruvate signal from blood into tumour, K ip , and the forward and reverse fractional rate constants for pyruvate‐lactate signal exchange, k pl and k lp . An analogous model was developed for urea, enabling estimation of urea tumour losses and the blood clearance parameter, K iu . A spectral fitting procedure to blood time‐course data proved superior to assuming a gamma‐variate form for the AIFs. Mean arterial blood pressure marginally correlated with clearance rates. K iu equalled K ip , indicating equivalent permeability of the tumour vasculature to urea and pyruvate. Fractional loss rate constants due to effluxes of pyruvate, lactate and urea from tumour tissue into blood ( k po , k lo and k uo , respectively) indicated that T 1 s and the average flip angle, θ , obtained from arterial blood were poor surrogates for these parameters in tumour tissue. A precursor‐product model, using the tumour pyruvate signal time‐course as the input for the corresponding lactate signal time‐course, was modified to account for the observed delay between them. The corresponding fractional rate constant, k avail , most likely reflected heterogeneous tumour microcirculation. Loss parameters, estimated from this model with different TRs, provided a lower limit on the estimates of tumour T 1 for lactate and urea. The results do not support use of hyperpolarised urea for providing information on the tumour microcirculation over and above what can be obtained from pyruvate alone. The results also highlight the need for rigorous processes controlling signal quantitation, if absolute estimations of biological parameters are required.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".