Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente artículo busca explicar la emergencia de las masivas movilizaciones de los últimos 15 años en Chile, a partir de la emergencia del proceso de repolitización del individuo y de la particularización de la experiencia de lucha. Se basa en entrevistas realizadas en el marco de una tesis doctoral a activistas de tres movimientos sociales: el de pobladores por una vivienda digna, el de estudiantes secundarios y el LGBTQ. La cuestión clave es el rol que el individuo juega en estas movilizaciones. La hipótesis que subyace a este trabajo es que las movilizaciones sociales actuales han logrado darse masivamente manteniendo al individuo como eje valórico de este proceso y, de esa manera, superan la aparente dicotomía entre acción colectiva e individualismo. Se pasa de un individualismo como signo de fragmentación social a una repolitización del individuo, lo cual ha implicado una nueva forma de contestación social y de colectivismo que debe tener como punto de anclaje el valor de las subjetividades singulares presentes en el proceso de movilización.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".