MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3216336514 · doi:10.1016/j.simpa.2021.100185

vid-SAMGRAH: A PyTorch framework for multi-latent space reinforcement learning driven video summarization in ultrasound imaging

2021· article· en· W3216336514 on OpenAlexafffund
Roshan P. Mathews, Mahesh Raveendranatha Panicker, Abhilash Rakkunedeth Hareendranathan

Bibliographic record

VenueSoftware Impacts · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersScience and Engineering Research BoardCompute CanadaNvidiaYale University
KeywordsAutomatic summarizationComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceReinforcement learningUnsupervised learningDeep learningScalabilityMachine learningFeature (linguistics)Feature learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the need for automatic triaging and summarization of ultrasound videos for fast access to pathologically relevant information in the Emergency Department and lowering resource requirements for telemedicine. In this work, a PyTorch based unsupervised reinforcement learning methodology which incorporates multi feature fusion to output classification labels, segmentation maps and summary videos for lung ultrasound is presented. The use of unsupervised training eliminates tedious manual labeling of key-frames by clinicians opening new frontiers in scalability in training using unlabeled or weakly labeled data. Our approach was benchmarked against expert clinicians from different geographies displaying superior Precision and F1 scores (over 80% and 44%).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSoftware ImpactsSame topicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AIFrench-language works237,207