MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3216365111 · doi:10.1002/aenm.202103148

Washable and Stretchable Zn–MnO<sub>2</sub> Rechargeable Cell

2021· article· en· W3216365111 on OpenAlexafffund
Ngoc Tan Nguyen, Bahar Iranpour, Evan Cheng, John D. W. Madden

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Energy Materials · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced battery technologies research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceElectrolyteChemical engineeringPolymerSeparator (oil production)Carbon blackCathodeComposite materialMembraneElectrodeNanotechnologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A cell that can operate even when doubled in length, and that withstands washing is demonstrated. The cell employs rechargeable and safe zinc/manganese dioxide chemistry. It incorporates a biocompatible poly(styrene – isobutylene – styrene) (SIBS) polymer as encapsulation, and in all layers. The SIBS‐based separator, made using solvent evaporation‐induced phase separation, has an ionic conductivity of 0.05 S m−1. Electrodes contain carbon black, combined with active particles and SIBS as the binder. Stretchable current collectors are carbon black/carbon nanofiber/SIBS composites and exhibit a sheet resistance of 27 Ω ⬜−1 under 100% strain. These components are encapsulated by SIBS membranes into a full cell, thin‐film configuration, creating a single, polymer‐based intrinsically stretchable battery. The resulting cell has a reversible specific capacity of 160 mAh g−1 cathode active mass. Capacity retention is 75% following 500 charge and discharge cycles. Owing to the low permeability of SIBS and the excellent adhesion between its layers, the battery has a good shelf‐life (22% mass loss of electrolyte after 523 days) and can withstand 39 washing cycles. The high capacity relative to other stretchable cells, along with the low materials cost, safe chemistry, durability, and washability, make this SIBS cell attractive for wearables and other applications that benefit from stretchability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Energy MaterialsSame topicAdvanced battery technologies researchFrench-language works237,207