Deep Learning Based Super Resolution and Classification Applications for Neonatal Thermal Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The thermal camera systems can be used in all kinds of applications that require the detection of heat change, but thermal imaging systems are highly costly systems. In recent years, developments in the field of deep learning have increased the success by obtaining quality results compared to traditional methods. In this paper, thermal images of neonates (healthy - unhealthy) obtained from a high-resolution thermal camera were used and these images were evaluated as high resolution (ground truth) images. Later, these thermal images were downscaled at 1/2, 1/4, 1/8 ratios, and three different datasets consisting of low-resolution images in different sizes were obtained. In this way, super-resolution applications have been carried out on the deep network model developed based on generative adversarial networks (GAN) by using three different datasets. The successful performance of the results was evaluated with PSNR (peak signal to noise ratio) and SSIM (structural similarity index measure). In addition, healthy - unhealthy classification application was carried out by means of a classifier network developed based on convolutional neural networks (CNN) to evaluate the super-resolution images obtained using different datasets. The obtained results show the importance of combining medical thermal imaging with super-resolution methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".