MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3216381663

МИНИСТЕРСКАЯ РЕФОРМА, КАК ОДНО ИЗ НАПРАВЛЕНИЙ РЕФОРМИРОВАНИЯ ПОЛИТИЧЕСКОЙ СИСТЕМЫ РОССИЙСКОЙ ИМПЕРИИ В ПЕРВОЙ ЧЕТВЕРТИ XIX В

2013· article· ru· W3216381663 on OpenAlex
Пустовая Елена Павловна

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueПРАВО И ГОСУДАРСТВО ТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА · 2013
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEuropean Political History Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmpirePolitical sciencePoliticsQuarter (Canadian coin)Economic historyHistoryLawArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

В статье говорится о министерской реформе как об одном из направлений реформирования политической системы Российской империи в первой четверти XIX в.The article talks about the Ministerial reform as one of directions of reforming the political system of the Russian Empire in the first quarter of the 19th century.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.461
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1910.122

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it