Truthful Deep Mechanism Design for Revenue-Maximization in Edge Computing With Budget Constraints
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, collaborative task offloading in edge computing is studied, where computation requesters can offload tasks to not only the edge server, but also nearby smartphone users. By considering the fact that smartphone users may not always be willing to provide such computation service because of the consumption of their own energy and resources, a truthful mechanism is designed to provide incentive to smartphone users. The design aims to maximize the net revenue of the service provider and addresses more practical, but more complicated, scenarios of unknown <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">a prior</i> distribution information on smartphone users’ private information. To tackle this high computational complexity, which makes the traditional mechanism design methods infeasible, a new approach, called truthful deep mechanism, is proposed by leveraging a multi-task machine learning model, where inherently inter-connected collaborator selection and pricing policy determination are decided by designing two deep neural networks. The numerical results show that the proposed deep truthful mechanism can ensure a convergence to a stable state and can satisfy all required economical properties, including individual rationality, incentive compatibility, and budget balance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".