La formation des psychoéducateurs et des psycho-éducatrices au Québec : rétrospective et prospective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les psychoéducateurs constituent un groupe de plus de 5000 professionnels québécois qui interviennent auprès de personnes aux prises avec des difficultés d’adaptation se manifestant sur le plan comportemental dans leurs différents milieux de vie. Cette expertise s’appuie notamment sur une formation initiale universitaire de 1eret de 2e cycle. Dans une visée rétrospective et prospective, cet article retrace d’abord l’évolution de la formation des psychoéducateurs au cours des soixante dernières années, de ses origines dans les internats pour jeunes en difficulté d’adaptation jusqu’au développement de programmes doctoraux en psychoéducation. L’arrivée de l’ordre professionnel, en 2000, est ensuite présentée comme un jalon important de cette histoire avec l’encadrement des programmes donnant accès au permis d’exercice. Enfin, un regard est posé sur les défis que cette formation devra relever au cours de la prochaine décennie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".