MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3216425729 · doi:10.14740/ijcp466

Fetal Remains Post-Spontaneous Abortion: Ethical Consideration

2021· article· en· W3216425729 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Seyed Mohammad Nahidi, Farah Awad, Drezelle Mills, Victoria Lewis, Patrisha Woolard

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Clinical Pediatrics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbortionMiscarriageMedicineTragedy (event)FetusObstetricsPregnancyGynecologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Disposal of fetal remains as a biohazard material after spontaneous abortion has been the standard practice in many states across the United States of America. In certain states, when a patient requests the fetal remains, it raises a controversy. A proper funeral and burial may be beneficial for patients who suffered from a miscarriage. A patient who is informed of the options available to her after a miscarriage can then decide the most suitable path to deal with such a tragedy. However, the return of the fetal remains to the patient still remains a controversy in certain locations. Int J Clin Pediatr. 2021;10(4):83-85 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/ijcp466

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.424
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.474
Teacher spread0.396 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Clinical PediatricsSame topicGrief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207