The challenges and pitfalls of diagnosing adenomyoepithelioma in needle core biopsies of the breast
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adenomyoepithelioma (AME) is a rare mammary neoplasm characterized by a biphasic proliferation of both myoepithelial and epithelial cells. These two cellular populations can contribute disproportionately to the lesion and assume a wide spectrum of growth patterns and histopathological features. Further, large variations exist in clinical presentation and imaging findings. A clear challenge that therefore arises is identifying AME on limited core biopsy material. As there are numerous potential mimickers of AME depending on the sampled region, accurate diagnosis of the entity is crucial. Recognizing the dual nature of AME and the architectural features it can possess, in combination with a panel of immunohistochemical markers, is necessary to establishing a diagnosis. Herein, we present a comprehensive approach and guiding principles to reaching a definitive diagnosis of AME on breast needle core biopsies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it