MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3216465216 · doi:10.7939/r3-95g3-g941

Assessment of Mechanical, Thermal Insulation and Water Sorption Properties of Natural Fiber-Cement Composites

2021· article· en· W3216465216 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kareem Abdelghany

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Library · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNatural Fiber Reinforced Composites
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComposite materialMaterials scienceSorptionCementFiberNatural fiberThermalChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growth of awareness about the environmental issues caused by the construction industry has fueled innovation in sustainable building practices in recent years. Of particular concern is the need for solutions to reduce the high carbon footprint of current building materials such as cement and concrete. A potential remedy to the adverse environmental effects of the construction industry is the replacement of non-renewable materials with a natural and easily renewable counterpart. This study investigates the effects of fiber type, fiber volume fraction, and fiber size on the compression, flexural, thermal insulation and water absorption properties of natural fiber cement composites. The fibers used were obtained from Alberta based crops: wheat straw and hemp hurd. These fibers were each sieved and characterized in two size categories, coarse and fine, and added to the cement at 3 volume fractions: 5%, 10%, and 15%. The results indicate that the addition of fibers to cement decrease the compression strength, increase the flexural strength, increase the thermal resistivity, and increase the saturation moisture content of the composite compared to the control (unreinforced cement). In addition, a moisture sorption model based on Fick’s law showed reasonable fit to the experimental data. Overall, this study demonstrated that cements reinforced with natural fibers offer improved flexural (crack resistance) and insulating properties compared to unreinforced cement which may be advantageous in a number of building product applications (e.g. architectural or nonstructural components). However, these natural fiber composites also had reduced compressive strengths, and were more susceptible to moisture uptake. These characteristics may affect the usage of these materials in main structural components, and may also require proper protection from moisture in outdoor applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.706

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta LibrarySame topicNatural Fiber Reinforced CompositesFrench-language works237,207