Validación de la versión francesa del FACES IV con una población de adolescentes francófonos que proviene de una muestra poblacional y clínica
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El FACES IV (Olson, Gorall y Tiesel, 2006) es un instrumento de medida para el funcionamiento familiar utilizado en varios medios de investigacion y de practica en Quebec. El presente estudio tiene como objetivo la validacion de la estructura factorial de la version francesa del FACES IV y permite examinar su coherencia interna, su veracidad de prueba-reprueba y su vigencia simultanea con 123 familias (padres y/o adolescentes) de la poblacion general y 256 familias que reciben servicios de intervencion de crisis. La estructura factorial de la herramienta presenta indicios de ajustes adecuados tanto para los padres como los adolescentes fiadores. Ademas posee propiedades psicometricas satisfactorias que confirman su utilizacion posible tanto con una poblacion general como clinica. Sin embargo, los resultados invitan a la prudencia en la utilizacion de la herramienta con adolescentes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".