MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3216594308 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2021.3131744

Blockchain-Based Secure and Cooperative Private Charging Pile Sharing Services for Vehicular Networks

2021· article· en· W3216594308 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlockchain Technology Applications and Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsReputationComputer scienceData sharingComputer securityCryptocurrency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the proliferation of electric vehicles (EVs), private charging pile (PCP) sharing networks are likely to be an integral part of future smart cities, especially in places with limited public charging infrastructure. However, there are a number of operational challenges associated with the deployment of PCPs in such a shared and untrusted environment. For example, how do we formulate efficient PCP sharing strategies in PCP sharing networks, while also taking into consideration the dynamic charging behaviors of EVs? Therefore, in this paper, we propose an energy <underline xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">b</u> lockchain- <underline xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">b</u> ased secure P <underline xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">C</u> P sharing scheme (BBC) for PCP sharing networks. First, an energy blockchain-based framework is designed for PCP sharing networks to facilitate energy sharing services for EVs and PCPs, using both distributed ledgers and cryptocurrency. Then, we devise a reputation-based secure PCP sharing algorithm to improve consensus efficiency with smaller signature sizes. In addition, a distributed reputation mechanism is constructed to assess the trustworthiness of consensus nodes in blockchain, based on ratings, behaviors, and fading. We also model the interactions among EVs and cooperative PCPs as a joint coalition-matching game, and obtain the optimal strategies of PCPs and EVs by analyzing the Nash-stable coalitional structure and stable many-to-one matching pairs. Extensive simulations and the real-world implementation demonstrate that the proposed approach improves the utility of EV users and renewable energy efficiency in PCP sharing networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.749
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it