SÍNDROME DE BURNOUT NA ENFERMAGEM: UMA ANÁLISE REFLEXIVA DOS ESTRESSORES EMOCIONAIS E INTERPESSOAIS CRÔNICOS NO TRABALHO SOB O VIÉS DO SUICÍDIO
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SÍNDROME DE BURNOUT NA ENFERMAGEM changes due to stress levels due to work overload, night shifts, low wages, poor working conditions, difficulties in interpersonal relationships in the work environment, physical and emotional exhaustion , which ends up leading the professional to a loss of motivation and impairing the performance of tasks, and not treated in a timely manner, has high levels of suicidal behavior.Through a bibliographical and systematic review of the literature, we observed that its etiology was clarified and that the treatment should be carried out in a multidisciplinary way.This is a literature review study with a narrative approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it