MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3216654926 · doi:10.1121/10.0007998

Ketos—A deep learning package for creating acoustic detectors and classifiers

2021· article· en· W3216654926 on OpenAlexaff
O. S. Kirsebom, Fábio Frazão, Bruno Padovese, Sadman Sakib, Stan Matwin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial neural networkPython (programming language)Artificial intelligenceDeep learningClassifier (UML)Deep neural networksMachine learningSoftware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Passive acoustic monitoring is a useful technique for studying aquatic animals, but sustained observing systems require automated algorithms for detecting and classifying sounds of interest. In the last decade, deep neural networks have proven highly successful at solving a wide range of pattern recognition tasks, and recently, we have seen the first promising applications of deep neural networks to detection and classification tasks in marine bioacoustics. Deep neural networks exhibit a high degree of versatility and adaptability: the same network architecture can be trained to accomplish a multitude of tasks by feeding appropriate training data to the network without the need to modify the underlying algorithm. Thus, neural networks have the potential to transform our approach to developing acoustic detection and classification programs, enabling researchers in the field to develop or re-purpose their own programs. MERIDIAN is contributing towards this goal through the development of the open-source Python package Ketos, which provides a high-level programming interface for building training datasets and developing neural network based detectors and classifiers for analyzing underwater acoustics data. In this contribution, an overview of the software package will be given and its functionalities will be demonstrated through case studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.388

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207