Color Based Object Categorization Using Histograms of Oriented Hue and Saturation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the last few years, there has been a lot of interest in making smart components, e.g. robots, able to simulate human capacity of object recognition and categorization. In this paper, we propose a new revolutionary approach for object categorization based on combining the HOG (Histograms of Oriented Gradients) descriptors with our two new descriptors, HOH (Histograms of Oriented Hue) and HOS (Histograms of Oriented Saturation), designed it in the HSL (Hue, Saturation and Luminance) color space and inspired by this famous HOG descriptor. By using the chrominance components, we have succeeded in making the proposed descriptor invariant to all lighting conditions changes. Moreover, the use of this oriented gradient makes our descriptor invariant to geometric condition changes including geometric and photometric transformation. Finally, the combination of color and gradient information increase the recognition rate of this descriptor and give it an exceptional performance compared to existing methods in the recognition of colored handmade objects with uniform background (98.92% for Columbia Object Image Library and 99.16% for the Amsterdam Library of Object Images). For the classification task, we propose the use of two strong and very used classifiers, SVM (Support Vector Machine) and KNN (k-nearest neighbors) classifiers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".