MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W321671606

Review: Environmental Citizenship

2006· article· en· W321671606 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Green Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Philosophy and Ethics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitizenshipVirtueSociologyEnvironmental ethicsEnvironmental philosophyPoliticsSustainabilityState (computer science)Public sphereLawPolitical sciencePhilosophyEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Review: Environmental Citizenship Andrew Dobson and Derek Bell (Eds.) Reviewed by Christina Behme Dalhousie University, Canada Andrew Dobson and Derek Bell's. (Eds.). Environmental Citizenship . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006. 285 pp. ISBN: 0-262-52446-5 (paperback original); US$24.00. Andrew Dobson and Derek Bell combine work of specialists in sociology, political theory, philosophy, psychology, and education to provide a multidisciplinary perspective of theory and practice of environmental citizenship. The book consists of a thorough introduction and ten thematically grouped chapters: chapters in p art I illuminate what environmental is and how it can be achieved; chapters in part II examine existing obstacles and opportunities for environmental citizenship. John Barry introduces a concept of sustainability citizenship, which goes beyond purely environmental sphere and includes social and economic practices. He holds that sustainability has to be learned and that state needs to play active role, encouraging citizens to fulfill their obligations to secure common good and their own interest . Barry doubts that requires suppression of private interests in favor of public ones. Instead, he suggests: the private sphere can partake of ecological virtue and be a site for practicing citizenship (p.37). Drawing on work of philosophers from Aristotle (350 BC/1976) to Rawls (1973), James Connelly explores concept of virtue, defining it as: character trait a human being needs to realize environmental ends (p.51). Environmental does not require establishing new virtues but utilizes existing virtues to bring about a new, sustainable form of society. That means, an eco-virtue is internally motivating ecological thoughtfulness leading to action (p.66). Further, Connelly explores a legislative framework within which virtues can be exercised and stresses that environmental requires active state. Taking a Heideggerian (1962) approach, Bronislaw Szerszynski employs three visual metaphors (blindness, distance, and movement) to illustrate how requires an imaginative removal of self from immediate everyday engagement in world (p.75). He emphasizes need to combine a locally rooted wayfinding (p.94) with abstract universal approach to environmental citizenship. The next two contributors examine concept of environmental from a feminist's and activist's perspective. Sherilyn MacGregor critiques gender blindness of existing environmental concepts and highlights tensions between advocating labor- and time-intensive lifestyle changes and demanding more active citizen participation in public sphere. Dave Horton examines green lifestyles lived by activists, role of networks, spaces, materialities, and times, and how activist derived elite model of environmental can be broadened (p.127). Horton emphasizes that the practice of groups and networks of environmentally concerned and committed best define environmental (p. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.380
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it