Uplink Performance of MmWave-Fronthaul Cell-Free Massive MIMO Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cell-free (CF) massive multiple-input multiple-output (mMIMO) is a promising candidate to support the requirements of the fifth-generation (5 G) and beyond networks. However, the capacity of the fronthaul network dramatically influences its performance. While wired fronthaul links can be seen as the optimal choice, they may not be practically feasible. Exploiting the enormous bandwidth available in the millimeter-Wave (mmWave) band to support the fronthaul links paves the way to achieve the full potential of CF mMIMO systems. In this paper, we investigate the uplink (UL) performance of CF mMIMO systems supported by mmWave-fronthaul networks. Using tools from stochastic geometry, we derive analytical expressions for both the distribution of the provided fronthaul capacity and the average UL data rates. We show that although increasing the density of blockages degrades the average UL data rates, increasing the density of CPUs can limit such effect. Moreover, the obtained results reveal that the network deployment should be adjusted according to the available fronthaul bandwidth and the density of blockages. In particular, for a given fronthaul bandwidth, increasing the density of APs beyond a certain limit would not achieve further improvement in the UL data rates. Besides, increasing the number of antennas per AP may even cause a degradation in the system performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".