A visco-inertial formulation for capillarity in irregular channels and tubes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a novel formulation of capillarity, which geometrically extends the Bosanquet equation to irregular geometries, taking the effect of inertia and the dynamic contact angle into account. The governing equation is an integrodifferential equation that is solved numerically and compared with computer simulations, experimental data, and other cases available in the literature. The numerical examples investigated in this work show that contrary to flat channels and tubes, inertial effects decay much slower in corrugated channels and tubes due to the walls' geometrical fluctuations. We also draw the paramount conclusion that the true solution for Jurin's height in irregular capillaries is path-dependent and highly sensitive to the initial conditions, and no single static-equilibrium solution can necessarily be attributed to the eventual position of the meniscus. Resulting from the non-linear dynamics, the multiple equilibria in the presence of gravity for irregular capillaries can only be analyzed if the effect of inertia is considered, which has largely been neglected in the literature thus far.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".